Thursday, December 26, 2019

End Of Treatment Abstinence Self Efficacy - 942 Words

Annotated Bibliography Crouch, T. B., DiClemente, C. C., Pitts, S. C. (2015). End-of-treatment abstinence self-efficacy, behavioral processes of change, and posttreatment drinking outcomes in Project MATCH. Psychology Of Addictive Behaviors, 29(3), 706-715. doi:10.1037/adb0000086 In this journal article, the researchers observe the relationship between self-efficacy, behavioral process of change and alcoholism. Self-efficacy is one’s belief that they will be able to succeed in specific situations. According to the study, they found that only 14.6% of Americans with an alcohol problem have sought treatment. The article states that self-efficacy has been studied as a predictor of relapse for alcoholics. They saw a direct correlation between alcohol abstinence and high self-efficacy. There is not much information of the relation between self-efficacy and the behavior process of change. However, researchers have made hypotheses relating self-efficacy to general coping. It has been shown that successful coping leads to a higher self-efficacy as well. It is important to know that alcohol is a poor way of coping with problems. The research that was conducted was unbiased and looked at real results of how long people were able to stay away from alcohol, as well as psychological evaluations of their emotional state. Each of the participants of the study were evaluated and their self-efficacy was evaluated as either positive or negative. The goal of this research was to showShow MoreRelatedPsychological And Psychological Effects Of Drug Addiction Essay841 Words   |  4 PagesMOTIVATION FOR ABSTINENCE/RECOVERY Everybody s treatment needs are different based on their history of abuse, substance being abused, duration of abuse and much more. Depending on these factors, you may require varying combinations of services and treatment such as a combination of counseling or psychotherapy, medication, medical services and family therapy. Additionally, these needs may change as treatment and recovery progresses (www.treatment.psychologytoday.com). Treatment is just theRead MoreBenefits Of Self Efficacy High While Recovery From An Addiction1479 Words   |  6 Pagesthey have low self-efficacy. If people have low self-efficacy in their ability to stay sober it will mean that they are more susceptible to relapse. They will not have the motivation to do those things that they need to do in order to maintain their sobriety. It may only take a few bumps on the recovery path to knock them completely off course and they will use this as justification to return to alcohol or drug abuse. This is why it is important that people keep their self-efficacy high while recoveryRead MoreResearch Assignment . 15. Alyssa Swartz. May 2, 2017. Criminal3997 Words   |  16 Pageswill be creating my own drug treatment program to decrease the likelihood of relapse. Hypothesis An increase in self-efficacy will reduce relapse rates. Variables Independent variable: meditation in the treatment program will increase self-efficacy. Dependent variable: reduce relapse over 1 year. Method This treatment program is designed to strengthen the user’s self-efficacy. To do this, the user will attend group meditation classes as part of treatment. The group will consist ofRead MoreThe Opioid Crisis And Communities Nationwide3993 Words   |  16 Pageswill be creating my own drug treatment program to decrease the likelihood of relapse. Hypothesis An increase in self-efficacy will reduce relapse rate. Variables Independent variable: meditation in the treatment program will increase self-efficacy. Dependent variable: reduce relapse over 1 year. Method This treatment program is designed to strengthen the user’s self-efficacy. To do this, the user will attend group meditation classes as part of treatment. The group will consist ofRead MorePsychoactive Substances : A Psychoactive Substance Essay1966 Words   |  8 Pagesexperience and how it felt. Motivation for Abstinence/Recovery Motivation Everybody s treatment needs are different based on their history of abuse, the substance abused, and the duration of abuse. Depending on these factors, you may require varying combinations of services and treatment such as a combination of counseling or psychotherapy, medication, medical services and family therapy. Additionally, these needs may change as treatment and recovery progress (www.treatment.psychologytodayRead MoreThe Various Types Of Rehabilitation2446 Words   |  10 Pageslittle rehabilitative focus -actual â€Å"correcting†- in corrections systems. Many are not getting help with their addictions like counselling or treatment for mental illness. In order reduce the number of people in correctional facilities, our community must prevent people from getting to the point of crime in the first place. There is a need for more treatment centres in Canada to promote safer living in the community. Of particular concern is the fact that we do not have a clear sense of why some interventionsRead MoreEssay on Alcoholics Anonymous: 12-Step Program2169 Words   |  9 PagesAnonymous (AA) is the largest and most commonly known self-help group in the world. Since the creation of AA in 1935, there have been many programs modeled after it, which are also based on the 12-Step Program. Some of these include Narcotics Anonymous (NA) and Chemically Dependent Anonymous, as well as programs for specific drugs, such as Cocaine Anonymous (CA) and Crystal Meth Anonymous (NIDA, 2012). Attendance and participation for self-help groups are open for anyone to attend and free ofRead MoreSocial Work Observation Paper974 Words   |  4 Pagesmembers share a common understanding of struggling to remain sober. Acknowledgement and appreciation is shown when a member shares how they have applied the twelve-steps to work through problems. The final step of separation involves tying up loose ends, finalizing a solution or plan (Hepworth et al., 2017, 2013, p. 490). The group places emphasis to apply twelve-steps, reach out to sponsors, and maintain attendance. Some group members stay after the meeting, share hugs, talk with newcomers, expressRead MoreThe Is The Static Procedure Of A.a Essay2106 Words   |  9 Pageseffective, and even if they are, is there room for growth in the treatment methods of A.A.? To find these answers we must begin with the basics, taking a look into the details of A.A. There will be a review of a typical A.A. meeting discussing the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the program, addressing the length of treatment, and the typical flow of session. This analysis will also examine research findings to determine the efficacy of the A.A. Twelve-Step program. In addition, further explorationRead MoreIs Self Esteem Is The Most Consistent Predictor Of The Likelihood And Extent Of Substance Abuse1 668 Words   |  7 PagesClient Goal Research reveals that self-esteem is the most consistent predictor of the likelihood and extent of substance abuse (Uba et al., 2013). The client is a 15- year old female who was court ordered to Inspirations for Youth and Families treatment center. Client was arrested for shop lifting but was also charged with the possession of Heroin. For the past couple weeks, the client presented with low self-esteem of self that may have played a role in her poor choice in substance abuse. On top

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Essay on The American Civil War was Unavoidable - 2135 Words

If one thing is clear from studying early American history, it is that the Civil War was an unavoidable tragedy. Often, hindsight allows us to recognize those points at which history could have taken a different direction, if only some person or thing were different in some way. This is not the case with the American Civil War. Four factors support the notion of inevitability. This paper will explore the way that economics, previous compromises, changing social mores and values, and the nature of politics laid a foundation for the continued regional conflict which eventually resulted in the Civil War. The economic aspects often come in second to morality when discussing slavery in the South’s plantation economy, but they are†¦show more content†¦In other words, they were denied the franchise while also being used to give more power to their masters, who in essence were able to buy influence by purchasing slaves to make their district larger and more influential. Some laws functioned to stem the tide of slavery, such as the Slave Trade Act of 1818, which served to â€Å"prohibit the introduction of slaves into any port or place within. . . the United States† (udayton.edu). Yet for each abolitionist victory, the Southern planation owners were well-prepared with legislation of their own for the purpose of maintaining the status quo. According to Rourk, and his colleagues, â€Å"the Fugitive Slave Act proved to be the most explosive of the compromise measures† (Rourk, et. al., 2009, p.481). This was because Northerners viewed it as an attempt to expand slavery beyond the South and to compel their participation in maintaining slavery, even if it defied their religious or personal morals. While Southerners may have believed that the law was justified, as it dealt with the return of what they saw as property, Northerners felt differently. The heart of the conflict between North and South includes a difference in viewpoint on the ins titution of slavery. The South saw economics as primary, while the Northerners increasingly saw economics as a secondary or tertiary concern after morality and unity. While hindsight now clearlyShow MoreRelated The American Civil War was Unavoidable Essay659 Words   |  3 Pages The American Civil War was unavoidable. Because of regional and political disputes the country would have continued to boil even if the extremists on both sides were kept under control. No matter what was done politically a conflict was necessary to eradicate slavery from this continent.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Anger in the South was becoming a growing trend. The Southerners were angered by the fact that, in their view, the North was trying to dissolve their way of life. Congressman Robert Toombs of Georgia saysRead MoreLeading to the Civil War644 Words   |  3 PagesThroughout history, wars started because of tension between two parties that blew up into full-fledged wars. At times, it is political tension caused by differences in political views. Other times, it is differences in the way they make money, economic disparities. It can even be social disputes that cause the war. The Civil War started because of confrontations about slavery between Northern and Southern United states. It was likewise caused by the different economic styles of the two halves ofRead MoreRhetorical Analysis Of Abraham Lincoln s Speech860 Words   |  4 Pagesthe American populous for a second time, in what was known as his second inaugural address, marking his second term in presidency, an d his second address attending to a divided and strained nation. As the Civil War marched closer to resolution the American populous wished for someone or something to blame: A target to vent the pains of the nation’s conflict, yet instead of condemnation of either side Lincoln offered the concept of inclusion: neither wished for and was responsible for the war, ergoRead MoreWar : An Unavoidable, Haunting, And Educational Event1149 Words   |  5 PagesWar: An Unavoidable, Haunting, and Educational Event â€Å"In Flanders Fields,† by John McCrae, â€Å"In Time of War,† by W.H. Auden, and â€Å"Facing It,† by Yusef Komunyakaa all share a theme of war. The symbols and settings used in these poems illustrate the theme of war and its hardships clearly. Last, the authors all have biographical backgrounds surrounding past wars. The symbols used in all three of these poems closely relate to the idea of war. In â€Å"In Flanders Fields,† McCrae uses the symbols of crossesRead MoreThe Moratorium March 752 Words   |  4 PagesMarch against the Vietnam War commenced in Washington D.C. Pacifists and peace administrators carried banners which stated, †A Calvinist for peace, No more war, We want peace now,† and some carried placards bearing the name of soldiers that had died during the war (Leen). The placards that had names of fallen soldiers were first used on November 13, 1969 during the protest called â€Å"March against Death.† Two days after this protest, the â€Å"Moratorium March† began. This was a massive march that consistedRead MoreMajor Cause Of The American Civil War1224 Words   |  5 PagesMAJOR CAUSES OF THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR I. Introduction to Civil War The American Civil War was a war within the United States of America fought by the North (Union) and the South (Confederacy) starting from 1861 and ending in 1865. This war was one of the most devastating events in American history, consuming more than 600,000 lives. It was thought to be one that molded the character of the American individual today. This war was seen as a War for Southern Independence or War of Rebellion for theRead MoreCause Of The American Civil War1403 Words   |  6 Pagesthe American Civil War. Many have stated that slavery was the primary cause for the Civil War. Some historians have argued that there were other causes of the Civil War. The one thing that all historians agreed upon was the division between the North (known as the Union) and the South (known as the Confederacy) that escalated on the soil of the United States of America (In Stampp, 1965). The battle between the two states is what created the â€Å"American Civil War.† The American Civil War startedRead MoreAlly Bireley. Mr. Cone. Apush - 1St. 24 February 2017.1427 Words   |  6 PagesSoldier’s Tale Amongst almost 3 million Civil War soldiers, over 600,000 lost their lives defending their notions of freedom and liberty in America. Approximately two-thirds of these soldiers, nonetheless, died from disease rather than wounds received on the battlefield. Lack of efficient medicine and health care caused much more impacting damage, as well as scarce, not up-to-date resources, and social divisions between the soldiers. Typically, an average Civil War soldier could expect to face extremeRead MoreThe Radical And The Republican996 Words   |  4 Pageson abolitionism, Abraham Lincoln, and the Civil War era. While Oakes is vigilant to dodge the evident dangers of hero-worship, his compassion for both Lincoln and Douglass is evident throughout. Oakes received the Lincoln Prize for his work on this manuscript which was published in 2007. Oakes: an American historian, professor of history and graduate school humanities at the City University of New York, teaches history courses on the American Civil War and Reconstruction, Slavery, the Old SouthRead MoreAbraham Lincoln And The Civil War956 Words   |  4 Pages Out of the first sixteenth president, Abraham Lincoln was the first president who created foundation about ending slaves in America via his Emancipation of Proclamation. Lincoln was also a strong supporter for Homestead Act and The Pacific Railway Act, which became an essential law for American economics. Furthermore, 13th Amendment was Lincoln top priority in legislation after he was reelected as the President. President Abraham Lincoln truly became one of the greatest presidents via these achievements

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Gay marriage persuasive essay free essay sample

The debate between whether gay marriage should be legalized or not has been a controversial topic recently. In the past twelve years, equal marriage rights have been legalized in 6 states of the U. S.. Eighteen states do not allow gay marriage and do not recognize civil unions. The other twenty six states allow civil unions, and some are debating legalizing gay marriage. Gay marriage should be legal across the United States. Not allowing gay marriage in any state is unconstitutional. If one state is to allow gay marriage, then the people that get married in that state are supposed to be legally married in all other states of the United States (Hertz). The constitution states, in article 5, that anything that a person performs in one state legally cannot be prosecuted if that person were to move to another state where it is not legal. Meaning that all of the gay marriages that take place in states where it is legal, are supposed to be legal everywhere else in the United States. Many of the arguments against gay marriage are religious, and religion and state are supposed to be separated in the United States (Waldman). The United States is supposed to be run based off of human rights and what works for the government. Many government officials try to run the government based on their religious beliefs, when the officials religious belief should not be taken into consideration on the judgement of gay marriage. The federal Defence of Marriage law was even deemed unconstitutional by one of the judges of the supreme court, Joseph L. Tauro (Michael). The government should be able to follow the rules that had been set hundreds of years ago. It is not acceptable for the government to go against its own words, not allow people to marry due to their religious beliefs when the constitution clearly states that religion and state are supposed to be separated. Not allowing gay marriage is also discrimination against all of the gay people in the United States. Not allowing gay marriage prevents gay people from gaining government protections that married people gain. It is denying them to file joint income taxes, which makes life much easier for couples that are living together. They are also not allowed to make medical decisions for their spouses if he or she becomes incapacitated and unable to make wishes for treatment (Wolfson). This is not fair to gay couples because they cannot do many of the things that a straight couple can do. For example, government protections provided by marriage apply to straight couples, but do not for gay couples. This story proves that even gay people that are married still do not have the same rights as straight people that are married, â€Å"Bradford Wells is being forced to make such a decision. His husband, Australian citizen Anthony John Makk, has only three days to legally live in the United States. If Bradford and Anthony were in a â€Å"traditional† marriage, U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services would bend over backward to keep the couple together. Unfortunately for them, and 26,000 other same-gender, bi-national couples in the US, the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) bars federal recognition of same-gender marriages† (Basjil). Gay marriages in the United States should be treated the same as straight marriages. If a straight person marries someone that is not a United States citizen, that person becomes a citizen just by the marriage. It should work the same for a gay marriage, this is discriminating against gay people by not giving them the same rights that straight people receive when married. Arguments against gay marriage are often contradicting or incorrect. The most commonly used argument against gay marriage is that â€Å"Marriage is an institution between a man and a woman, and that allowing gay marriage would taint the idea of marriage. † Christians typically argue that gays are an â€Å"abomination to God† and that they are condemned to hell, therefore should not be able to get married at all. When the truth is, there are only a few instances in the bible that state homosexuality as wrong, while there are many more that state women are of lesser value than men. (Frye). Using the bible as a resource for an argument against gay marriage is not the best because of its contradictions. Some people may even say that legalizing gay marriage would eventually lead to legalizing incest, bestial, and polygamous marriages. This argument is possibly one of the worst because there is nothing that can prove it. There is more evidence against gay marriage causing the legalization of these other types of marriage. Out of all of the countries that have legalized gay marriage, none of them have come anywhere close to legalizing incest, beastial, or polygamous marriages. (Scott Bidstrup) â€Å"Marriage is an institution between one man and one woman. Well, thats the most often heard argument, one even codified in a recently passed U. S. federal law. Yet it is easily the weakest. Who says who marriage is to be defined by? The married? The marriable? Isnt that kind of like allowing a banker to decide who is going to own the money in stored in his vaults? It seems to me that if the straight community cannot show a compelling reason to deny the institution of marriage to gay people, it shouldnt be denied. And such simple, nebulous declarations are hardly a compelling reason. Theyre really more like an expression of prejudce than any kind of a real argument. The concept of not denying people their rights unless you can show a compelling reason to do so is the very basis of the American ideal of human rights. Marriage is for procreation. The proponents of that argument are really hard pressed to explain why, if thats the case, that infertile couples are allowed to marry. I, for one, would love to be there when the proponent of such an argument is to explain to his post-menopausal mother or impotent father that since they cannot procreate, they must now surrender their wedding rings! That would be fun to watch! Again, such an argument fails to persuade based on the marriages society does allow routinely, without even a second thought. Same-sex couples arent the optimum environment in which to raise children. Thats an interesting one, in light of who society does allow to get married and bring children into their marriage. Check it out: murderers, convicted felons of all sorts, even known child molesters are all allowed to freely marry and procreate, and do so every day, with hardly a second thought by these same critics. So if children are truly the priority here, why is this allowed? Why are the advocates of this argument not working to prohibit the above categories of people from raising children? The fact is that many gay couples raise children, adopted and occasionally their own from failed attempts at heterosexual marriages. Lots and lots of scientific studies have shown that the outcomes of the children raised in the homes of gay and lesbian couples are just as good as those of straight couples. The differences have been shown again and again to be insignificant. Psychologists tell us that what makes the difference is the love of the parents, not their gender. The studies are very clear about that. And gay people are as capable of loving children as fully as anyone else. Gay relationships are immoral and violate the sacred institution of marriage. Says who? The Bible? Somehow, I always thought that freedom of religion implied the right to freedom from religion as well. The Bible has absolutely no standing in American law (and none other than the father of the American democracy, Thomas Jefferson, very proudly took credit for that fact), and because it doesnt, no one has the right to impose rules anyone else simply because of something they percieve to be mandated by the Bible. Not all world religions have a problem with homosexuality; many sects of Buddhism, for example, celebrate gay relationships freely and would like to have the authority to make them legal marriages. In that sense, their religious freedom is being infringed. If one believes in religious freedom, the recognition that opposition to gay marriage is based on religious arguments is reason enough to discount this argument† (Scott Bidstrup). There are plenty more of arguments just like these, and a majority of them do not have a proper backup. Many of these arguments also have to do with religion, which are not supposed to have anything to do with the government anyway. What these incorrect arguments have to prove is that there is no real reason that gay marriage should not be legal. Why people do not want gay marriage to be legal in the United States is a mystery, because these arguments do not have enough support to be logical or even make sense. Gay marriage should be legalized all across the United States, because there is no good reason to deny people rights just because of their sexual orientation.  My call to action is for people to just be more open minded and to realize gay people are people too, and that they should be granted all of the same rights that straight people are given.

Monday, December 2, 2019

The action or state of setting someone or somethin Essays

The action or state of setting someone or something apart from other people or things or being set apart. When slavery was reaching its end a new set of laws in the United States emerged, called the John Crow Laws. Between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s. Jim Crow Laws enforced segregation and discrimintation. Jim Crow Laws made it legally acceptable to force African Americans to use separate washrooms, entrances, water fountains, schools, and transportation than white Americans. Jim Crow Laws were meant to establish the right of 'white' Americans to treat African Americans 'separate, but equal'. First Nations were also prohibited from using the same facilities in transportation - rail cars, accommodations on steamships are two examples. Both First Nations, and Asians were restricted from some professions in the early 20th Century. Indians were also prohibited from entering pool halls or bars. The right to vote was granted to Indians in 1960 for federal elections. Other non-white groups acquired voting rights earlier - shortly after World War Two. The African-American Civil Rights Movement was an ongoing fight for racial equality that took place for over 100 years after the Civil War. Leaders such as Martin Luther King, Jr., Booker T. Washington, and Rosa Parks paved the way for non-violent protests which led to changes in the law. When most people talk about the "Civil Rights Movement" they are talking about the protests in the 1950s and 1960s that led to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended segregation in public places and banned employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin, is considered one of the crowning legislative achievements of the civil rights movement. Jem is confident that his dad is gonna win but Reverend Sikes tells Jem not to be so confident because he had never seen a jury in favor of a black man over a white man.